‘ENTITLEDS’ & THE RULE OF LAW

Allow me to put a suggestion before you, gentle (or otherwise) reader:
Those who seek to destroy the rule of law and fully reinstate the rule of the biggest bully should not be allowed to hide behind that same rule of law when defeated and cornered.
Yes, go ahead and read it again. Read it as many times as you need to have it sink in.
Resistance, while it remains nonviolent or clearly defensive (that is, does not fire the first shot) is not against the rule of law; such resistance seeks to uphold and strengthen the true rule of law.
Mere table-turning, as opposed to making a new table where all may have seats, is just part of the biggest-bully law. Same s**t, just different throwers and catchers.
Nonviolent resistance failed among the ‘Palestinians’ because seeing the Israelis and other Jews as human beings has never been part of the program for them. They are still too caught up in their own colonist mentality which tells them they are superior and deserve everything they can take and that the proper place for Jews is that of ‘common n***ers’ in the Jim Crow South. Not to mention that any Jew should be thankful they haven’t been sent up the chimneys as they all deserve!
Meanwhile, we have our own problems with our ‘entitleds’. Most of them are what I call pale males (I am one) who think no one else but them should have any power, be it political, economic or cultural.
Question for all my readers: should we really be surprised that the ‘entitleds’ of the Middle East are befriended by our ‘entitleds’?
In any case, those who tell us not to assume good faith on the part of any…